Posted on

Patient engagement may not decrease costs

[preamble]Our government wants us to believe that by engaging and educating a patient will reduce costs. Of course they have no data to back this up or any idea how it will decrease anything. The retail realty is simple, when a patient/customer knows about a product/procedure/disease, they are more likely to ask more questions and seek additional advise and come to the office/store with impossible to dispel pre-conceived notions that are usually not accurate. Hence, by doing the impossible that our government wants us to do, we create a patient society that believes they know more about their health and treatment than physicians. Whilst this on the surface may seem like a good thing, and it is to a certain degree. However, it actually erodes the doctor/patient trust and has patients demanding to stay in the hospital longer and requesting specific drugs and seeking other options. All this does is increase the costs – nor reduce them and does not make for a healthier patient.
Patients want and need to trust their doctor -period – anything that gets in the way of this costs more and is not effective – plain and simple. [backtopost]

Importance  Patient participation in medical decision making has been associated with improved patient satisfaction and health outcomes. However, there is little evidence concerning its effects on resource utilization. Patient participation in medical decision making has been hypothesized to decrease excess utilization but might be expected to increase utilization when other decision makers have incentives to reduce utilization, as under prospective payment systems for hospital care.

Objective  To examine the relationship between patient preferences for participation in medical decision making and health care utilization among hospitalized patients.

Design and Setting  Survey study in an academic research setting.

Participants  A survey that included questions about preferences to receive medical information and to participate in medical decision making was administered to all patients admitted to the University of Chicago Medical Center general internal medicine service between July 1, 2003, and August 31, 2011, and completed by 21 754 (69.6%) of admitted patients.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The survey data were linked with administrative data, including length of stay and total hospitalization costs. We used generalized linear models to measure the association of patient preference for participation in decision making with length of stay and costs.

Results  The mean length of stay was 5.34 days, and the mean hospitalization costs were $14 576. While 96.3% of patients expressed a desire to receive information about their illnesses and treatment options, 71.1% of patients preferred to leave medical decision making to their physician. Preference to participate in decision making increased with educational level and with private health insurance. Compared with patients who had a strong desire to delegate decisions to their physician, patients who preferred to participate in decision making concerning their care had a 0.26-day (95% CI, 0.06-0.47 day) longer length of stay (P = .01) and $865 (95% CI, $155-$1575) higher total hospitalization costs (P = .02).

Conclusions and Relevance  Patient preference to participate in decision making concerning their care may be associated with increased resource utilization among hospitalized patients. Variation in patient preference to participate in medical decision making and its effects on costs and outcomes in the presence of varying physician incentives deserve further examination.